Justia Badge
Badge 1
Badge 3
Badge 4
Badge 5
Badge 6

|

Naperville city planners expect Naperville’s population to grow to 155,000 by the year 2020. This population growth sparked the Naperville City Council to create the Comprehensive Transportation Plan (the “Plan”), which represents the desire to maintain mobility and safety throughout the City of Naperville.

The City of Naperville’s Comprehensive Transportation plan has 14 component parts. They include:

1. Master Thouroughfare Plan 2. Trip Reduction Plan 3. Transit Plan 4. Pedestrian Plan 5. Bicycle Plan 6. Neighborhood Traffic Mitigation/Calming Plan 7. Traffic Safety Plan 8. Traffic Enforcement Plan 9. Intelligent Transportation Systems Plan 10. Truck Route Plan 11. Air Quality and Noise Management Plan 12. Coordinated Roadway Improvement Plan 13. Arterial Landscape Plan 14. Parking Plan Continue reading

|

The Kane County 2040 Transit Plan (the “Plan”) represents the long-term plan for Kane County’s transportation future. The Plan is designed to meet Kane County’s transportation needs until the year 2040.

The Plan takes into account the varied transportation needs of the county–from the rural areas in the western part of the county to the urban areas to the east. With Kane County’s population projected to rise by nearly 300,000 people over the next 30 years (most of which will occur in the urban areas in the eastern part of Kane County), the Plan seeks to balance the transit needs in the rural areas with those needs in the urban areas.
Continue reading

|

Although amounts vary, nearly every state, including Illinois, requires minimum vehicle liability insurance. The mandate is designed to protect people from the risks posed by uninsured drivers. The reality, however, is that there are many uninsured motorists on the roads. Considering the most common personal injury claims arise from traffic accidents, the risks posed by uninsured motorists cannot be overstated. Unless the proper steps are taken, a relatively straightforward process can become an expensive, time-consuming endeavor, resulting in unpaid medical bills and a judgment-proof defendant.
Continue reading

|

A motor vehicle accident or pedestrian accident can be a traumatic experience and has the potential to cause painful personal injuries, such as a broken bones, painful back injuries, or head injuries. In 2010, there were approximately 89,000 persons injured in motor vehicle crashes in Illinois. This means that nearly ten people are injured in motor vehicle accidents every hour.

When an injured person incurs medical bills for treatment of injuries related to the accident, it is important to understand what may be required in order to obtain reimbursement. In Wills v. Foster, the Illinois Supreme Court held that Illinois follows the “reasonable value” approach in determining whether a plaintiff is allowed to recover their medical bills. In presenting medical bills as evidence, there are several potential pitfalls that a plaintiff should consider.
Continue reading

|

When a motor vehicle accident occurs, there will invariably be physical damage to the motor vehicles. It is common for the cars involved in an accident to be photographed at the scene of the accident. Such photographs are often helpful in demonstrating the severity of the collision at trial. However, the photographs are not automatically admissible at trial to prove injuries or damages. Illinois Appellate Courts have wrestled with this question for years, and the Illinois Supreme Court has yet to clearly resolve the dispute.

Formerly, photographs depicting damage to a vehicle were admitted into evidence as long as the attorney laid the proper foundation. In Cancio, the Court found that although photographs of the plaintiff’s vehicle revealed little damage, they were relevant and helpful for the jury to consider in determining the extent of the plaintiff’s injuries. Cancio v. White, 697 N.E.2d 749 (1st Dist. 1998). In DiCosola, the Illinois Appellate Court ruled that the trial court had the discretion to keep photographs out of evidence, especially without the use of expert testimony. DiCosola v. Bowman, 794 N.E.2d 875 (1st Dist. 2003).
Continue reading

|

Any number of injuries, including birth injuries, brain injuries, spinal injuries, and even death, can be caused by a hospital’s mistake, a doctor’s misdiagnosis, anesthesia complications, a physician’s incompetence, and other causes. In Illinois, malpractice actions (lawsuits for negligence) against physicians, psychologists, podiatrists, dentists, hospitals, naprapaths (health care professionals focusing on non-invasive manual techniques), or any physicians licensed to treat people without the use of drugs or surgery must follow the strict procedural guidelines set forth in Section 2-622 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure.

Designed to prevent frivolous lawsuits, like many similar state statutes, Sec. 2-622 requires an attorney to first consult with a medical professional before filing the complaint in a court of law. In order to properly initiate the lawsuit, the attorney must attach an affidavit to the Complaint declaring that the attorney has consulted with a medical professional who has reviewed the plaintiff’s injuries and believes the Plaintiff has a meritorious cause of action. A written report from the physician, setting forth the basis for the professional’s opinion, must also be attached.
Continue reading

|

According to the Kane County Division of Transportation, the running of red lights remains one of the major causes of car accidents. Nationwide, nearly 1,000 people are killed and approximately 178,000 are injured when vehicles crash as a result of negligent drivers running red lights.

The Illinois legislature empowers each county to regulate its streets and highways. In 2006, the Illinois legislature went further, allowing for red light cameras at high volume intersections. Kane County, DuPage County, Cook County, Lake County, and Will County, are among the Illinois counties permitted to install establish automated traffic law enforcement systems (red light cameras). Designed to capture a motor vehicle’s license plate, red light cameras take a digital photo of a motor vehicle entering an intersection while the red light signal is illuminated.
Continue reading

|

According to the Washington Examiner, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) by way of the Transportation Secretary, Ray LaHood, told Congress on February 28, 2012, that new rules mandating rearview cameras on all passenger vehicles would be delayed until the end of 2012. In 2008, Congress passed the Cameron Gulransen Kids Transportation Safety Act. The law instructed the NHTSA to set standards for rear visibility. The Chicago Tribune reported that regulators were pushing to require rearview cameras in all new cars by 2014. It’s now unclear, however, whether the most recent delay will push back the 2014 date.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Established in 1970, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), a part of the Department of Transportation, is responsible for reducing deaths, injuries, and economic losses resulting from motor vehicle accidents. In November 2006, as a part of this mandate, the NHTSA investigated the safety issues related to motor vehicle backover accidents. Backover accidents occur when a driver is backing up a vehicle and strikes a child, pedestrian, vehicle, or other object. The NHTSA tested different technologies that are designed to prevent pedestrian injuries, injuries to minors and children, and collisions with other objects. Based on its research and testing, the NHTSA determined that ultra-sonic and radar parking technologies inadequately prevented most injuries to child pedestrians; rather, the NHTSA found that the technology most effective in preventing backover car accidents was camera technology.
Continue reading

|

Dog bites and animal attacks are more common than most people think. Often, the disfiguring injuries that result are never reported to animal control officials. Every year in the U.S., there are nearly 4.7 million dog bites, 800,000 of the attacks require medical attention. To compensate for the harm caused by dog bites, the insurance industry pays over $1 billion in claims each year.

Illinois has enacted laws designed to protect the rights of those who have suffered an injury due to an animal attack. Previously, under the common law, a person injured by a dog could recover only by proving that the dog had previously manifested a disposition to bite or cause harm, and that the owners of the dog were aware of the dog’s harmful disposition. This was known as the “one bite rule.” Although the rules set forth under the common law still exist, the Illinois Animal Control Act now provides an easier remedy for dog bite victims. Under the Animal Control Act, dog bite victims no longer need to prove that the dog owner had prior knowledge of the animal’s vicious nature. The Act makes it easier to plead and prove a dog bite injury case.
Continue reading

|

The time after a car accident can be stressful and frightening. Painful injuries and worries about keeping up with work and family are the biggest concerns. You may be in no position to speak to anyone – let alone the insurance adjuster for the at-fault driver. But the insurance company will often contact you and ask you to settle your claim quickly, often for a figure that is far less than it is worth. If you have been hit by a car while riding your bike or as a pedestrian, you can expect a call from the insurance company. My advice: Never speak to them without a lawyer.

No matter what the adjuster tells you, the at-fault driver’s insurance company does not have your interests in mind. In fact, the adjuster has a conflict of interest in saying anything to you about the value of your claim. It is important NOT to speak with the at-fault driver’s insurance company without counsel. Any competent attorney knows that a call to the insurance company is likely to be recorded; therefore, it is not in your interest to say anything at all. It is best to leave all communication to your counsel.
Continue reading

Contact Information
Naperville Office
1730 Park St #201
Naperville, IL 60563
Phone: (630) 527-4177Fax: (630) 527-4178
St. Charles Office
1700 Lincoln Hwy #G
St. Charles, IL 60174
Phone: (630) 524-2323

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2016 – 2025, John J. Malm & Associates Personal Injury Lawyers
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design